Jul 10, 2026, 9:22 AM

This commit is contained in:
Paweł Domański
2026-07-10 07:22:22 +00:00
parent 9afd601aaf
commit 6dfd0b0db8
+107
View File
@@ -349,3 +349,110 @@ flowchart TD
```
Jeżeli budujesz system typu **Coordinator → Research → Writing → Review → Aggregate**, to Aggregator jest ostatnim agentem przed zwróceniem odpowiedzi do użytkownika.
# Architekura
Da się, ale ten obraz jest bardzo szczegółowy. Zamiast przepisywać wszystkie opisy agentów 1:1, proponuję najpierw odtworzyć **strukturę organizacyjną**, a potem ewentualnie rozbudować o opisy.
Na obrazku widzę 4 domeny:
* Engineering (Architect → Frontend, Backend, Security, QA, Release, Implementation)
* Marketing (Mouse → Content, Video Director, Scriptwriter, Designer, Video Editor, Asset Producer)
* Growth (Analyst → Funnels, Pricing, Retention, Analytics, Partnerships)
* Research (Oracle → Signals, Synthesis, Competitive, Customer Research, Product Research)
Mermaid:
```mermaid
flowchart LR
CTO["Engineering Architect"]
CMO["Marketing Mouse"]
CGO["Growth Analyst"]
CRO["Research Oracle"]
CTO --> Frontend["Frontend"]
CTO --> Backend["Backend"]
CTO --> Security["Security"]
CTO --> QA["QA"]
CTO --> Release["Release"]
CTO --> Implementation["Implementation"]
CMO --> Content["Content"]
CMO --> VideoDirector["Video Director"]
CMO --> Scriptwriter["Scriptwriter"]
CMO --> Designer["Designer"]
CMO --> VideoEditor["Video Editor"]
CMO --> AssetProducer["Asset Producer"]
CGO --> Funnels["Funnels"]
CGO --> Pricing["Pricing"]
CGO --> Retention["Retention"]
CGO --> Analytics["Analytics"]
CGO --> Partnerships["Partnerships"]
CRO --> Signals["Signals"]
CRO --> Synthesis["Synthesis"]
CRO --> Competitive["Competitive"]
CRO --> Customer["Customer Research"]
CRO --> Product["Product Research"]
classDef lead fill:#222244,color:white,stroke:#aaa;
classDef eng fill:#1f4e79,color:white;
classDef mkt fill:#8c5e00,color:white;
classDef growth fill:#5b3a8c,color:white;
classDef research fill:#8c2f39,color:white;
class CTO lead;
class CMO lead;
class CGO lead;
class CRO lead;
class Frontend,Backend,Security,QA,Release,Implementation eng;
class Content,VideoDirector,Scriptwriter,Designer,VideoEditor,AssetProducer mkt;
class Funnels,Pricing,Retention,Analytics,Partnerships growth;
class Signals,Synthesis,Competitive,Customer,Product research;
```
Jeżeli to ma być do Twojego systemu agentowego (Coordinator → subagenci), to lepiej byłoby narysować to jako **hierarchię agentów z ownerami**, np.:
```mermaid
flowchart TB
Coordinator
Coordinator --> Engineering
Coordinator --> Marketing
Coordinator --> Growth
Coordinator --> Research
Engineering --> Frontend
Engineering --> Backend
Engineering --> Security
Engineering --> QA
Engineering --> Release
Engineering --> Implementation
Marketing --> Content
Marketing --> Scriptwriter
Marketing --> Designer
Marketing --> VideoDirector
Marketing --> VideoEditor
Marketing --> AssetProducer
Growth --> Funnels
Growth --> Pricing
Growth --> Retention
Growth --> Analytics
Growth --> Partnerships
Research --> Signals
Research --> Synthesis
Research --> Competitive
Research --> CustomerResearch
Research --> ProductResearch
```
To już wygląda jak prawdziwy **multi-agent architecture diagram**, który można później połączyć z Twoim wcześniejszym diagramem **Coordinator / Planner / Research / Review / Aggregate**.