Jul 10, 2026, 9:22 AM
This commit is contained in:
@@ -349,3 +349,110 @@ flowchart TD
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Jeżeli budujesz system typu **Coordinator → Research → Writing → Review → Aggregate**, to Aggregator jest ostatnim agentem przed zwróceniem odpowiedzi do użytkownika.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# Architekura
|
||||
|
||||
Da się, ale ten obraz jest bardzo szczegółowy. Zamiast przepisywać wszystkie opisy agentów 1:1, proponuję najpierw odtworzyć **strukturę organizacyjną**, a potem ewentualnie rozbudować o opisy.
|
||||
|
||||
Na obrazku widzę 4 domeny:
|
||||
|
||||
* Engineering (Architect → Frontend, Backend, Security, QA, Release, Implementation)
|
||||
* Marketing (Mouse → Content, Video Director, Scriptwriter, Designer, Video Editor, Asset Producer)
|
||||
* Growth (Analyst → Funnels, Pricing, Retention, Analytics, Partnerships)
|
||||
* Research (Oracle → Signals, Synthesis, Competitive, Customer Research, Product Research)
|
||||
|
||||
Mermaid:
|
||||
|
||||
```mermaid
|
||||
flowchart LR
|
||||
|
||||
CTO["Engineering Architect"]
|
||||
CMO["Marketing Mouse"]
|
||||
CGO["Growth Analyst"]
|
||||
CRO["Research Oracle"]
|
||||
|
||||
CTO --> Frontend["Frontend"]
|
||||
CTO --> Backend["Backend"]
|
||||
CTO --> Security["Security"]
|
||||
CTO --> QA["QA"]
|
||||
CTO --> Release["Release"]
|
||||
CTO --> Implementation["Implementation"]
|
||||
|
||||
CMO --> Content["Content"]
|
||||
CMO --> VideoDirector["Video Director"]
|
||||
CMO --> Scriptwriter["Scriptwriter"]
|
||||
CMO --> Designer["Designer"]
|
||||
CMO --> VideoEditor["Video Editor"]
|
||||
CMO --> AssetProducer["Asset Producer"]
|
||||
|
||||
CGO --> Funnels["Funnels"]
|
||||
CGO --> Pricing["Pricing"]
|
||||
CGO --> Retention["Retention"]
|
||||
CGO --> Analytics["Analytics"]
|
||||
CGO --> Partnerships["Partnerships"]
|
||||
|
||||
CRO --> Signals["Signals"]
|
||||
CRO --> Synthesis["Synthesis"]
|
||||
CRO --> Competitive["Competitive"]
|
||||
CRO --> Customer["Customer Research"]
|
||||
CRO --> Product["Product Research"]
|
||||
|
||||
classDef lead fill:#222244,color:white,stroke:#aaa;
|
||||
classDef eng fill:#1f4e79,color:white;
|
||||
classDef mkt fill:#8c5e00,color:white;
|
||||
classDef growth fill:#5b3a8c,color:white;
|
||||
classDef research fill:#8c2f39,color:white;
|
||||
|
||||
class CTO lead;
|
||||
class CMO lead;
|
||||
class CGO lead;
|
||||
class CRO lead;
|
||||
|
||||
class Frontend,Backend,Security,QA,Release,Implementation eng;
|
||||
class Content,VideoDirector,Scriptwriter,Designer,VideoEditor,AssetProducer mkt;
|
||||
class Funnels,Pricing,Retention,Analytics,Partnerships growth;
|
||||
class Signals,Synthesis,Competitive,Customer,Product research;
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Jeżeli to ma być do Twojego systemu agentowego (Coordinator → subagenci), to lepiej byłoby narysować to jako **hierarchię agentów z ownerami**, np.:
|
||||
|
||||
```mermaid
|
||||
flowchart TB
|
||||
|
||||
Coordinator
|
||||
|
||||
Coordinator --> Engineering
|
||||
Coordinator --> Marketing
|
||||
Coordinator --> Growth
|
||||
Coordinator --> Research
|
||||
|
||||
Engineering --> Frontend
|
||||
Engineering --> Backend
|
||||
Engineering --> Security
|
||||
Engineering --> QA
|
||||
Engineering --> Release
|
||||
Engineering --> Implementation
|
||||
|
||||
Marketing --> Content
|
||||
Marketing --> Scriptwriter
|
||||
Marketing --> Designer
|
||||
Marketing --> VideoDirector
|
||||
Marketing --> VideoEditor
|
||||
Marketing --> AssetProducer
|
||||
|
||||
Growth --> Funnels
|
||||
Growth --> Pricing
|
||||
Growth --> Retention
|
||||
Growth --> Analytics
|
||||
Growth --> Partnerships
|
||||
|
||||
Research --> Signals
|
||||
Research --> Synthesis
|
||||
Research --> Competitive
|
||||
Research --> CustomerResearch
|
||||
Research --> ProductResearch
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
To już wygląda jak prawdziwy **multi-agent architecture diagram**, który można później połączyć z Twoim wcześniejszym diagramem **Coordinator / Planner / Research / Review / Aggregate**.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user