diff --git a/agent.md b/agent.md
index 76db354..b155681 100644
--- a/agent.md
+++ b/agent.md
@@ -349,3 +349,110 @@ flowchart TD
 ```
 
 Jeżeli budujesz system typu **Coordinator → Research → Writing → Review → Aggregate**, to Aggregator jest ostatnim agentem przed zwróceniem odpowiedzi do użytkownika.
+
+
+# Architekura 
+
+Da się, ale ten obraz jest bardzo szczegółowy. Zamiast przepisywać wszystkie opisy agentów 1:1, proponuję najpierw odtworzyć **strukturę organizacyjną**, a potem ewentualnie rozbudować o opisy.
+
+Na obrazku widzę 4 domeny:
+
+* Engineering (Architect → Frontend, Backend, Security, QA, Release, Implementation)
+* Marketing (Mouse → Content, Video Director, Scriptwriter, Designer, Video Editor, Asset Producer)
+* Growth (Analyst → Funnels, Pricing, Retention, Analytics, Partnerships)
+* Research (Oracle → Signals, Synthesis, Competitive, Customer Research, Product Research)
+
+Mermaid:
+
+```mermaid  
+flowchart LR
+
+    CTO["Engineering Architect"]
+    CMO["Marketing Mouse"]
+    CGO["Growth Analyst"]
+    CRO["Research Oracle"]
+
+    CTO --> Frontend["Frontend"]
+    CTO --> Backend["Backend"]
+    CTO --> Security["Security"]
+    CTO --> QA["QA"]
+    CTO --> Release["Release"]
+    CTO --> Implementation["Implementation"]
+
+    CMO --> Content["Content"]
+    CMO --> VideoDirector["Video Director"]
+    CMO --> Scriptwriter["Scriptwriter"]
+    CMO --> Designer["Designer"]
+    CMO --> VideoEditor["Video Editor"]
+    CMO --> AssetProducer["Asset Producer"]
+
+    CGO --> Funnels["Funnels"]
+    CGO --> Pricing["Pricing"]
+    CGO --> Retention["Retention"]
+    CGO --> Analytics["Analytics"]
+    CGO --> Partnerships["Partnerships"]
+
+    CRO --> Signals["Signals"]
+    CRO --> Synthesis["Synthesis"]
+    CRO --> Competitive["Competitive"]
+    CRO --> Customer["Customer Research"]
+    CRO --> Product["Product Research"]
+
+    classDef lead fill:#222244,color:white,stroke:#aaa;
+    classDef eng fill:#1f4e79,color:white;
+    classDef mkt fill:#8c5e00,color:white;
+    classDef growth fill:#5b3a8c,color:white;
+    classDef research fill:#8c2f39,color:white;
+
+    class CTO lead;
+    class CMO lead;
+    class CGO lead;
+    class CRO lead;
+
+    class Frontend,Backend,Security,QA,Release,Implementation eng;
+    class Content,VideoDirector,Scriptwriter,Designer,VideoEditor,AssetProducer mkt;
+    class Funnels,Pricing,Retention,Analytics,Partnerships growth;
+    class Signals,Synthesis,Competitive,Customer,Product research;
+```
+
+Jeżeli to ma być do Twojego systemu agentowego (Coordinator → subagenci), to lepiej byłoby narysować to jako **hierarchię agentów z ownerami**, np.:
+
+```mermaid
+flowchart TB
+
+    Coordinator
+
+    Coordinator --> Engineering
+    Coordinator --> Marketing
+    Coordinator --> Growth
+    Coordinator --> Research
+
+    Engineering --> Frontend
+    Engineering --> Backend
+    Engineering --> Security
+    Engineering --> QA
+    Engineering --> Release
+    Engineering --> Implementation
+
+    Marketing --> Content
+    Marketing --> Scriptwriter
+    Marketing --> Designer
+    Marketing --> VideoDirector
+    Marketing --> VideoEditor
+    Marketing --> AssetProducer
+
+    Growth --> Funnels
+    Growth --> Pricing
+    Growth --> Retention
+    Growth --> Analytics
+    Growth --> Partnerships
+
+    Research --> Signals
+    Research --> Synthesis
+    Research --> Competitive
+    Research --> CustomerResearch
+    Research --> ProductResearch
+```
+
+
+To już wygląda jak prawdziwy **multi-agent architecture diagram**, który można później połączyć z Twoim wcześniejszym diagramem **Coordinator / Planner / Research / Review / Aggregate**.